What is a consequence of removing effective control measures for pests?

The correct choice indicates that pest resurgence is a significant consequence of removing effective control measures for pests. When control measures, such as pesticides or biological controls, are removed or diminished, the populations of pests that were previously managed can begin to rebound quickly. This resurgence occurs because the natural checks and balances that kept these pest populations in check, such as predation, competition, or disease, may be weakened or eliminated.

In many cases, when control measures are lifted, not only do the existing pest populations have the potential to grow unchecked, but they may also return in larger numbers than before. This is often due to their ability to reproduce rapidly and exploit the available resources without competition. Therefore, pest resurgence can lead to even more significant infestations and greater challenges in managing these pests in the future.

The other options present scenarios that do not accurately reflect the typical outcomes of removing pest control measures. For instance, while one might expect increased prey populations in a healthy ecosystem, this is not a direct consequence of removing pest control. Furthermore, the idea that no control measures are needed overlooks the necessity of managing pest populations in agricultural and residential settings. Lastly, while immediate pest extinction is an unrealistic expectation, as most pests are highly adaptable and resilient, the opposite effect—